




|
 |



Back to assessment directory
Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool
Financial Empowerment
by: Andrew Lewis*
University of Wisconsin Extension
This section of the Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool can help guide a group
discussion about an organization's financial empowerment process. This group discussion
ideally should include board members, staff, volunteers, and service recipients, but could
be used as a self-assessment tool by anyone associated with a nonprofit organization.
Review the assessment form below. First, check the indicators that have been completed or accomplished. Next, indicate
the amount of improvement that you think is needed for that indicator (None or Not
Applicable, Some, or much improvement needed). It is your perception of the organization.
There are no right or wrong answers. If used with a group, each individual should complete
the assessment tool. After allowing adequate time, compare responses and discuss any areas
where there were different perceptions. As a final step, identify the top 2-3 priorities
where there was a high level of consensus on an indicator needing "much"
improvement. If you are doing this as a group, have each individual select their top three
priorities and then tally the "votes" for the group to identify the top three.
Begin developing an action plan that would address these issues (A suggested action plan
format can be found at the end of the document). After successfully implementing your
action plans that address your top priorities, revisit your assessment tool and begin
developing action plans for the other indicators that need attention.
This particular section of the assessment tool focuses on the financial
empowerment process and concepts presented during the educational programs produced by the Learning
Institute for Nonprofit Organizations. The complete Nonprofit Organizational Assessment
Tool will be comprised of eight sections based on the content presented in the eight
programs that make up the curriculum of the Learning Institute for Nonprofit
Organizations. The Learning
Institute for Nonprofit Organizations was a collaboration involving the
University of Wisconsin Extension and the Society for Nonprofit Organizations.
The University has ended its formal relationship with the SNPO, but videotape
presentation kits reside in most of the University of Wisconsin Extension County
offices.
*LI faculty contributor for this section: Peter
Brinckerhoff
Financial Empowerment Assessment Tool**
Revenue Generation
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
 |
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization had more revenue than expenses in at
least seven of the past 10 years? |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The organization knows and follows
funders' policies
relative to unexpended income (does it need to be returned?) and the need to spend
unrestricted income prior to grant awards. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. A written strategy has been developed that encourages the
organization to retain what it earns through restricted accounts or other mechanisms. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The organization has a fundraising plan and has determined
whether or not additional internal or external expertise in fundraising is needed. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The organization has a strategic plan that calls for
profitable operations, assesses new markets, and includes the establishment of an
endowment, an operating reserve, a mission reserve, and more staff training. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. The organization gets at least 5% or its total income from
earnings on its endowment. |
|
|
|
|
| 7. A restricted account or separate corporation has been
created to hold an endowment. |
|
|
|
|
| 8. There is a funding mechanism for the endowment as a means
of putting money aside. |
|
|
|
|
| 9. The organization has an established goal for the size of
an endowment for the end of each of the next five years. |
|
|
|
|
| 10. There are written policies that address the use
(including what uses are permitted) of the endowment. |
|
|
|
|
| 11. The organization has diversified funding with sources of
revenue from non-traditional, non-governmental sources. |
|
|
|
|
| 12. The organization has an outside business that brings in
adequate net revenues. |
|
|
|
|
| 13. The organization has established goals for business
development that define how much income is needed from new sources over the next five to
ten years. |
|
|
|
|
Operating Reserve
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
|
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization has a cash operating reserve of at least
90 days. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The organization has a policy, which states how many days
of cash operating reserves are best for the organization. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. The treasurer regularly reports the number of days of cash
on hand at the end of each reporting period. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The organization has established levels of cash (and
credit) reserves that allow you to invest in new services or expand current ones. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The organization is financially flexible enough to
accommodate changes in service delivery. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. There is a board policy on cash operating reserves that
includes the appropriate uses of the reserve, and who should authorize its depletion
beyond the minimum. |
|
|
|
|
Financial Information
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
 |
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization follows accounting practices which
conform to accepted standards and fulfill Internal Revenue Service requirements. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The organization shares its financial information widely,
and practices bottoms-up budgeting (Versus actual and/or comparative financials). |
|
|
|
|
| 3. The organization has an ongoing training program for staff
and board members that addresses how to read, interpret, and use the organizations
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. Members of the board and finance committee as well as the
CPA, and banker are regularly asked what financial reports and displays would be of most
use to them. These financials are then provided to those that requested them. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The executive director regularly meets with staff to
discuss both financial and non-financial information. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. The organization has documented a set of internal
controls, including the handling of cash and deposits, and approval over spending and
disbursements. |
|
|
|
|
| 7. The organization periodically forecasts year-end revenues
and expenses to assist the Board in making sound management decisions. |
|
|
|
|
| 8. The organization develops an annual comprehensive
operating budget, which include all expenses and revenue sources for all programs. This
budget is reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
| 9. The board of directors reviews assets and liabilities
every 12 months to determine if the organization has enough liquidity. |
|
|
|
|
Mission Reserve
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
 |
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization supports its mission directly by
establishing and using a rapid-response mission reserve. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The organization has a mission reserve as a restricted
account. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. There is a policy in place that addresses the funding
mechanism for the mission reserve. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. There are established rules for the mission reserve which
outline how funds are distributed, by whom, for what, and on what schedule. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The organization has an established goal for the size of
the mission reserve for each of the next five years, as well as goals for how much of the
fund is to be distributed. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. The organization has decided the next projects that will
be funded from the mission reserve and that information has been shared with the staff and
board. |
|
|
|
|
Debt Management
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
 |
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization is considered to be appropriately
leveraged. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The board reviews the status of all debt every 18 months,
and refinancing is considered. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. The organization has established appropriate
debt-to-net-worth benchmarks. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The organization is satisfied by the services that are
provided by its financial institution. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The organization has a pre-approved line of credit with
its selected bank. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. There is a five-year capital expenditure plan that is
updated annually. |
|
|
|
|
| 7. There are written guidelines on who can authorize debt. |
|
|
|
|
Sample Action Plans:
Use the following format to begin formulating an action plan that would improve your
organization's performance relative to a specific indicator listed above.
Indicator:
The executive director regularly meets with staff to
discuss both financial and non-financial information.
Task |
Time Line |
Who |
Will Do What |
Evaluation Measure |
Task #1 |
7 days |
Samantha (Executive Director) |
Will schedule a series of staff (volunteer
and paid) meetings devoted to reviewing the existing budget as well as identifying program
and capital expenditure items that are needed by the organization. Brainstorm on potential
revenue sources to fund new initiatives and capital budget items. |
Meetings are scheduled and attended. Staff
evaluations are positive and are eagerly engaged. |
Task #2 |
28 days |
Samantha & Bill (Board Chair) |
Review Program and capital budget items
identified by the staff as resources which are needed by the organization. Present these
recommendations to the board for review to begin the budgeting process for the next year. |
Potential new capital expenditures and
programs are presented to the board along with potential sources of revenue. |
| Task #3 |
3 months |
Board of Directors |
The Board begins formulating an operating
budget for the next year that is based on furthering the mission of the organization and
incorporates staff and board input. |
An operating budget is formulated and adopted that balances
revenue, and expenses and maintains an acceptable level of reserves. This operating budget
is based in part on the needs and opportunities identified by staff. |
| Task #4 |
Every 3 months |
Executive Director and staff |
Budget updates are scheduled during
regularly scheduled meetings. |
Staff understand and have input into financial decisions
which fund the mission activities of the organization. |
**Part of an 9-part
series of assessment tools that address critical management issues within a
nonprofit organizations. This tool was developed for the Learning Institute
for Nonprofit Organizations and is based in part on two existing tools:
Community Organizational Assessment Tool, Bright, Robert D., University of
Wisconsin Extension, 1995 (Adapted from Citizens Involvement Training Program., University
of Massachusetts, Amherst).
Checklist of Nonprofit Indicators, United Way of Minneapolis Area, 1998.
|
 |