


Back to assessment directory
Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool
Strategic Alliances
by: Andrew Lewis*
University of Wisconsin Extension
This section of the Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool can help guide a group
discussion about an organization's readiness for a strategic alliance. This group discussion
ideally should include board members, staff, volunteers, and service recipients, but could
be used as a self-assessment tool by anyone associated with a nonprofit organization.
As indicated in the Frequently Asked Questions not all organizations should
pursue a strategic alliance. For that reason, this section of the Organizational
Assessment Tool is structured a little differently from the other 7 sections. First, check
the organizational conditions where you could answer "yes". Next, indicate
whether a strategic alliance could address that condition (A lot, Somewhat, Not at All).
It
is your perception of the organization. There are no right or wrong answers. If used with
a group, each individual should complete the assessment tool. After allowing adequate
time, compare responses and discuss any areas where there were different perceptions. As a
final step, try to determine if you have a significant number of conditions where a
strategic alliance would help address a problem. Then, move on to the second
portion of the Assessment Tool that focuses on the organizational process.
Finally, attempt to complete an action plan to address weaknesses within your
organizational process.
This particular section of the assessment tool focuses on the concepts of strategic
alliances presented during the educational programs produced by the Learning Institute for
Nonprofit Organizations. The complete Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool will be
composed of eight sections based on the content presented in the eight programs that make
up the curriculum of the Learning Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
The Learning Institute for Nonprofit Organizations was a collaboration involving
the University of Wisconsin Extension and the Society for Nonprofit
Organizations. The University has ended its formal relationship with the SNPO, but videotape presentation kits reside in most of the University of
Wisconsin Extension County offices.
*LI faculty contributor for this section: David Campbell
Strategic Alliances Assessment Tool**
Conditions Within the Organization
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
 |
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. The organization is regularly faced with financial
resource challenges. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The organization considers its long term (five year)
financial future to be secure. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. The organization has the administrative capacity needed to
meet current funder requirements and management needs. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The organization has the administrative capacity needed to
meet future funder requirements and management needs. |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The organization uses its resources efficiently. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. The organization is sufficiently regarded by its
stakeholders. |
|
|
|
|
| 7. The organization is sufficiently regarded by its
stakeholders to ensure its long term competitiveness. |
|
|
|
|
| 8. The organization has the clout it needs to be successful
today. |
|
|
|
|
| 9. The organization has the clout it needs to be successful
over the long term. |
|
|
|
|
| 10. The organizations cost of doing business is
competitive. |
|
|
|
|
| 11. The organization is well positioned to compete
successfully for what it needs in the future. |
|
|
|
|
| 12. The organization is capable of responding to emerging
community needs on its own. |
|
|
|
|
| 13. The organization has the resources it needs to accomplish
its strategic objectives on its own. |
|
|
|
|
Organizational Process
| Indicator |
Done? |
Needs
Improvement ? |
| |
|
None/
N.A. |
Some |
Much |
| 1. A Strategic Plan or Strategic Direction has been
articulated within the past two years? |
|
|
|
|
| 2. Organizational needs have been identified in that plan or
elsewhere within the past two years? |
|
|
|
|
| 3. The need for strategic alliances has been articulated in
the organizations strategic plan? |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The value added by strategic alliances has been identified
by the organization? |
|
|
|
|
| 5. A plan for pursuing alliances has been established? |
|
|
|
|
| 6. Potential partners and their value have been identified
and assessed? |
|
|
|
|
| 7. A target list of partners has been developed and reviewed
among senior staff and Board? |
|
|
|
|
Sample Action Plans:
Use the following format to begin formulating an action plan that would improve your
organization's performance relative to a specific indicator listed above.
Indicator:
Potential partners and their value have been
identified and assessed.
Task |
Time Line |
Who |
Will Do What |
Evaluation Measure |
Task #1 |
7 days |
Executive Director and Board |
Have a working session focusing on the identification of
potential partners and what they would bring to the table. |
A matrix with organizations and the assets that they would
bring to an alliance would be completed. |
**Part of an 9-part
series of assessment tools that address critical management issues within a
nonprofit organizations. This tool was developed for the Learning Institute
for Nonprofit Organizations and is based in part on two existing tools:
Community Organizational Assessment Tool, Bright, Robert D., University of
Wisconsin Extension, 1995 (Adapted from Citizens Involvement Training Program., University
of Massachusetts, Amherst).
Checklist of Nonprofit Indicators, United Way of Minneapolis Area, 1998.
|