Timing First-cut Alfalfa is Both an Art and a Science Mike
Rankin As
we look back over the years, there has been no lack of information on when
is the optimum time to cut alfalfa. Some
of the proposed methods include: calendar date, visual maturity stage,
combination of calendar date and maturity stage, regrowth from
crown/axillary buds, sugar content (brix method), and measured forage
quality (e.g. scissors cutting information). With
all of the above guidelines as options, it becomes confusing as to what is
the best strategy for determining optimum cutting time.
To make matters even more complicated, using any of these guidelines
as the sole criteria for making a cutting management decision is probably
going to lead to a wrong decision in a significant number of situations. We
have long known that making accurate estimates of harvested forage quality
(bales or haylage) is an impossible task.
Why then should we assume that estimating the quality of standing
alfalfa is any easier? It's
not, especially for the first cutting.
A primary reason why no single criteria can predict optimum cutting
time is that environment plays a key role in both alfalfa growth and forage
quality. Moisture stress and/or
cool temperatures result in a slower decline of forage quality and generally
slower growth. Conversely, high
temperatures result in a more rapid decline in digestibility and increased
growth assuming adequate moisture is present.
Keeping these relationships in mind will help when making forage
quality estimates this spring. This
comprises the "art" of haymaking.
However, there is even more to consider. Until
plant breeders develop the perfect alfalfa plant, there will always be
tradeoffs between yield, quality, and persistence.
In the case of the initial spring harvest, persistence is easily the
least important issue from a timing perspective.
Research studies have repeatedly shown that alfalfa has maximum
resilience during the spring growth cycle.
However, first-cut timing may indirectly impact stand persistence
from the For
most dairy producers, forage quality is a non-negotiable item. In other words, it is typically the driver of harvest timing.
The challenge with first-cut is dodging the rain bullets to obtain an
acceptable quality on forage that will comprise 30 to 40 percent of the
total-season yield.
The first cutting of alfalfa offers the most opportunity for economic loss
or gain and for this reason gross miscalculations of forage quality simply
have to be avoided. The optimum
time to harvest the initial spring cutting is determined by knowing two
factors: 1) the number of rain-free days it will take to harvest and 2) the
quality of the standing forage. The
first factor will help estimate a baseline starting point to allow for the
harvest to be completed before forage quality drops to an unacceptable
level. In many situations, this
means starting to cut when standing alfalfa relative feed value (RFV) is in
the 170 to 180 range. For all
practical purposes, forget about visual stage of maturity and calendar date.
Neither factor, in and of itself, makes milk.
The tools are now available through local scissors cutting results
and by using Predictive Equations for Alfalfa Quality (PEAQ) to make
standing forage quality estimates that will eliminate major misjudgments in
harvest timing (assuming the weather cooperates).
|