Evidence for Processing Corn Silage Continues to Mount

Mike Rankin
Crops and Soils Agent - Fond du Lac County
University of Wisconsin - Extension


    Over the past several years, it has become clear that there are benefits to feeding processed corn silage. With these nutritional benefits documented, UW Ag Engineer, Kevin Shinners, has done several research trials to help characterize crop physical properties of various plant maturity stages and measure the impact of machine variables such as theoretical length of cut (TLC), roll speed differential, and roll clearance. He also addressed the issue of power requirements and harvester capacities when processing whole-plant corn silage. Here are some of the results and conclusions from these studies:

Features to look for in a processor

    Shinners notes that most crop processors on the market today have very similar roll diameter, tooth pitch, and speed ratio. Large diameter rolls generally offer better feeding characteristics and are less likely to plug (assuming all other factors are equal). Other features to consider are: ease of removing or disabling the processor to harvest other crops, ease of roll clearance adjustment, and complexity of the drive system. The following table outlines the general specifications of commercially available crop processors.

General specifications of commercially available crop processors (as of March 1, 1999)

Roll Diameter

inches

Pitch,

teeth per inch

Roll speed Ratio

%

Retail List1

$

JD 6000 series (SP)

8.5

4

21

~13,000

Claas 800 series (SP)

7.7

3.3

20

~15,000

NH FX series (SP)

7.9

4

9

~12,000

Gehl 1275 (PT)

8.5

4

13

~9,000

Gehl 1075 (PT)

8.5

4

13

~7,100

NH 900 (PT)

7.9

4

18

~7,000

Dion 1224

10.6

6

60

~7,800

Georgetown CP Kit2

8.5

4

20

~8,300

LSC CP Kit3

9

4

19

~11,500

1-Approximate retail price as of 3-1-99
2-Kits available for New Holland and Gehl pull-types
3-Kit for JD 3950/3970 pull types and JD 5830 SP

For more information contact Mike Rankin

HOME.gif (1887 bytes)