Introduction One of the many attachments available for farmers to purchase and put on their corn planter are devices collectively known as "seed firmers". Seed firmers attach to the planter directly behind the seed furrow openers and "press" the seed into the bottom of the furrow. The "advertised" result is more uniform seed placement and depth, better emergence, and ultimately higher grain yields. To date, there have been few coordinated studies documenting the positive merits of seed firmer use. Farm Journal magazine has reported results from on-farm comparisons where corn grain yields averaged 5 to 6 bushels more with the use of seed firmers (Finck, 1996). The objective of this study was to measure and determine the impact of seed firmers on several stand variability parameters and grain yield. Methods In 1998 on two Fond du Lac County farms (Malone and Eden locations), corn was planted in randomized strips both with and without Keeton seed firmers. In 1999, a similar study was established in Manitowoc County (Newton location). Field plots were established using a randomized complete block design with three replications. After corn emergence, the distance between 30 consecutive plants was measured for each row of every plot. Stand uniformity was characterized by determining standard deviation (SD), plant density, row gaps per 50 ft., and seed doubles per 50 ft. using a Microsoft Excel® spreadsheet program. Plant doubles were defined as any plants within 2 inches of each other and gaps were defined as spaces of 12 inches or more without an emerged plant. Grain yields were measured in the fall. Statistical analysis was done using AgStats2 (Karow, 1990). At one other location in 1998 (Two Rivers in Manitowoc County), the same treatments were imposed and data was collected with the exception of grain yield. Planting information for all plot locations is presented in Table 1.
Results and Discussion Differences in standard deviation of in-row plant spacings were small and inconsistent across locations (Figure 1). The same was true for plant density effects (Figure 2), seed doubles (Figure 3), and row gaps (Figure 4). None of the plant uniformity and density parameters were statistically significant (LSD0.05).
At the three locations where grain yields were measured, there was no significant difference between seed firmer treatments (LSD0.05). These results are presented in Figure 5.
In the limited number of field locations evaluated, we did not see consistent stand uniformity or yield benefits to using seed firmers. Both 1998 and 1999 were exceptional growing seasons in Wisconsin. Perhaps in a more adverse growing environment, the benefits would have been more pronounced. Depending on the type and make of seed firmer purchased, investment costs are between $25 and $60 per unit. Especially on the lower end of this investment range, it would not be difficult to achieve a reasonable return with only a 1 2 bushel per acre increase in grain yields. However, there are many other factors having a greater influence on stand uniformity and yield that probably need to be addressed first. These include insuring proper planting speed, maintaining the planter and its moving parts, checking for worn parts and replacing them according to manufacturers guidelines, and making sure that the planter is running level. Seed firmers will not cover-up for otherwise poor management. They may also need to be taken off or lifted-up when planting in wet conditions to avoid mud build-up and seed "dragging". References
Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank Scott Hendrickson, Manitowoc County Agriculture Agent, for his efforts in plot establishment and data collection and the farm cooperators from Fond du Lac and Manitowoc Counties who participated in this study.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||