Combined 2-year Results from Wisconsin
and Local Narrow Row Corn Plots

Mike Rankin
Crops and Soils Agent - Fond du Lac County
University of Wisconsin - Extension


    The theoretical advantages of ultra narrow corn rows are that plant spacing is more equidistant, the crop canopy closes faster, and weed control from a crop competition standpoint is improved. Some disadvantages include the current lack of narrow row equipment, the cost of converting or replacing current equipment, and the challenge of doing field operations after the corn has emerged.

    Research from most of the "corn belt" states has shown an overall 3 to 4 percent advantage to growing corn in ultra-narrow rows. However, the results have been variable with no common thread to predict when growers might expect more positive results. The most consistent and positive yield increases have been reported in our neighboring states of Michigan and Minnesota. Research in both of these states has consistently measured grain yield increases from narrow rows in the 7 to 10 percent range. This would imply that perhaps the best opportunity for economic returns to using narrow corn row spacings is in regions with shorter growing season environments.

1997-98 Wisconsin and Fond du Lac Results

    Narrow row corn research results from around Wisconsin are presented in Table 1. At each location, corn was planted in 30 inch rows and either 15 or 20 inch rows. All trials represent data from replicated field trials.

    At ten of the twelve Wisconsin site-years there was a positive response to narrow row spacings. Both negative responses occurred in Manitowoc County. Across all locations, a 3.6 percent yield increase was measured.

    When sifting through the narrow row information, keep in mind that costs must be weighed against potential yield benefits. For some, modifying existing corn planters and combine heads may be done without a large capital outlay. For others, it may mean purchasing new equipment at a much higher cost. This is clearly a management practice where the return will be more easily justified where larger acreages are planted. Each farm situation will be different.

Table 1.    Effect of row spacing on corn grain yield at seven Wisconsin locations (1997 - 1998)
   

Row Spacing (in.)

   
County

Year

30

 

15/20

 

Response

 

   ------bushels/acre------

 %

Rock

1997

177.3

178.1

+0.5

1998

206.0

210.4

+2.1

Columbia

1997

146.9

159.6

+8.6

1998

190.1

197.5

+3.9

Monroe

1997

169.6

180.8

+6.6

1998

164.0

184.5

+12.5

Fond du Lac

1997

161.7

164.0

+1.4

1998

200.4

231.0

+15.3

Waupaca

1997

126.8

128.9

+1.7

Manitowoc

1997

137.7

132.8

(3.7)

1998

200.8

184.1

(9.1)

Chippewa

1997

148.8

151.4

+1.7

Mean  

169.2

 

175.3

 

+3.6

Plant Density Effects

    At all test locations in 1997 and 1998, the effect of planting rate was also evaluated. Optimum planting rates for ultra-narrow rows seem to be the same as that for more traditional 30 inch rows. Most research confirms optimum planting rates in the 30,000 to 35,000 seeds per acre range.


For more information contact Mike Rankin

Return to FdL Agronomy
Home Page