|
Vol 4: No. 7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forage
Feedout Losses for Various Storage Systems |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Topics: |
Introduction What losses occur when feeding dry hay? What dry matter losses occur in silage storage systems? How many inches of silage should be removed from a bunker face? |
What
bunker removal techniques are recommended? How can dry matter losses be reduced in bags? Is there dry matter loss with tower silos? How is feed loss limited during feedout? References |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Much expense and time go into harvesting good quality forage and storing it for winter-feeding. You wouldn’t think about throwing away one third of this forage. This is what happens without proper feedout management. This fact sheet discusses feedout management strategies to help save valuable forage in different storage structures.A What losses occur when feeding dry hay? Limiting cattle access to
dry hay bales is the single greatest way to reduce forage feedout losses.
Livestock trample, over-consume, foul, and use for bedding 25 to 45%
of hay when it is fed without restrictions (Table 1).
Cattle waste less hay when
the amount fed is limited. Twenty-five
percent more hay is needed when hay is fed with unlimited supply than when a
one-day supply is fed. Feeding
hay daily according to diet needs can reduce hay loss.
A dry, pregnant cow will consume 20-30% more hay than her needs when
allowed free access to hay. Daily
feeding will force livestock to eat what they might otherwise refuse,
over-consume, trample, and waste. Daily feeding is more efficient, especially when hay is fed free access. Cattle will waste 45% more hay when a 4-day supply of hay is offered vs. a single day supply. No matter how hay is fed, efforts to limit access to hay and offering a single day supply per feeding reduce hay losses. What dry losses occur in silage storage systems? Dry matter losses during
feedout occur with any silage storage systems.
Losses occur during the actual feedout and refusal and wastage by the
animals. Maintaining anaerobic
conditions within the storage structure are critical for long-term silage
storage. Once the structure is
opened and silage exposed to oxygen, dry matter losses will begin to occur
more rapidly. A smooth, firm silage face fed-out at an appropriate rate is
key to reducing silage feedout losses. Table 2 indicates the
average percent feeding loss for silages stored in specific structures.
How
many inches of silage should be removed from the bunker face? The removal from the face
critically affects feedout loss and animal performance.
Recommended removal rates are 6 inches/day or greater.
Removal rates should never be lower than 4 inches/day in the summer
and 3 inches/day in the winter. At
no time should more than 3 days of silage be unprotected by plastic cover. Bunker silos and bagged forage losses can vary widely depending on management of the face. Some studies have indicated that by removing more than 6 inches off the face, losses can be reduced to around 5%. If less than 5 inches is taken off, then upwards of 10% or more can be lost. Many methods of silage removal are used on farms. Perhaps the most common is the bucket loader. It is preferred that silage be sliced from the top and allowed to fall to the floor. Any method that results in dislodging the face silage, creating gouges, cracks and potholes allows air to penetrate deep into the stack leading to increased deterioration. Bunker silos that are fed out using a face manager can reduce feed losses as long as all loosened silage is fed.3 Particle length can be affected by face managers and should be monitored closely. It is also important to closely estimate the amount of forage needed to ensure that all loosened forage is fed How can dry matter losses be reduced in bags? Remove at least 6 inches/day. Uncover only what will be used for that feeding. With bags, it is always important to close the bag off after each feeding to reduce losses. The site of the bag is important to reduce feedout losses. If placed near a wet area or on a soft surface, removal will be difficult and additional forage could be lost. Is there dry matter loss with tower silos? Feedout losses with tower silos can occur a few different ways. The main point is to remove at least 4 inches/day from the surface. Dry matter losses occur as soon as oxygen is reintroduced to the silage. Dry matter losses due to wind can be high if the silage is directed into a conveyor with no protective shelter or cover. Properly stored silage in tower silos, which feed into a feeding station or feed room where wind will have little effect, can have the lowest feedout losses of any structure (see Table 2). Making sure all conveyors have covers, drop pans and liners in will reduce losses. Holes in conveyor liners will allow forage to fall through, subjecting it to wind loss or being unavailable to the animal. Since feedout losses begin when silage is exposed to oxygen, it is important to remove no more feed than will be fed in a given feeding. Not only is dry matter lost in the unfed silage, animal performance is also lost. For example, when dairy cows were fed corn silage that had been exposed for four days, dry matter intake dropped 38%. 3 The
ambient temperature has a major influence on the aerobic stability of
silage. Dry matter robbing
microbes increase exponentially with temperature up to 130ºF.
This means silage fed-out during warm weather will deteriorate faster
that silage fed in colder weather. If possible, attempt to feed several
times per day on hot days. Pushing up feed regularly to encourage animals to consume silage and reduce exposure to oxygen will reduce dry matter loss and refusal. If forages are left in mangers or bunks by milk cows, these forages can be fed to heifers or dry cows. Another way to reduce dry matter loss is to not overfill the feed wagon or TMR mixer. Forage spilled in transport from the storage area to the animal can’t be recovered. 1.
Anderson, B., and Mader, T., 1996, University of Nebraska, “Management
to Minimize Hay Waste”, Publication G84-738-A. 2.
Penn State University Circular 396, “Harvesting and Utilizing Forage”,
October 1993. 3.
Management of Bunker Silos and Silage Piles, by Ken Bolton, Jefferson
County Dairy and Livestock Agent, and Dr. Brian Holmes, UW Biological
Systems Engineering Dept. 4. Corn silage production, management, and feeding. NCR publication NCR574.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||