|
Vol 6: No. 1 |
|
Sampling and Evaluating Total Mixed Rations
|
|
|
New laboratory test are now available to evaluate total diet NDF digestibility (NDFD) and provide laboratory energy estimates for total mixed rations (TMRs). Laboratory TMR evaluation can be used to cross check possible errors associated with formulating and mixing TMRs or can be used to assess possible assumptive errors in formulating ration energy density. Nutrients in TMRs are generally measured using wet chemistry laboratory procedures and energy estimates (TDN, NEL) are made using coordinated bio-nutrient summative models (NRC, 2001). Because accuracy and precision are paramount to estimate TMR energy content, laboratory TMR analysis requires excellent sampling procedures. What does the laboratory measure in a TMR? The CP, NDF, Fat, NDF digestibility (NDFD), Ash, Ca, and P content are the base nutrients typically measured in TMRs by the laboratory. Of critical importance is the measurement of NDFD which is used to estimate the energy available from NDF. The NDFD of a TMR is typically measured for 30 or 48 h in vitro using rumen fluid from a canulated cow. The digestibility of NDF in the TMR is required to make TMR energy estimates. How much can NDFD vary in a TMR? Presented in Figure 1 is a summary of NDFD values for 1000 TMRs evaluated at the Marshfield Soil and Forage Testing Laboratory. The NDFD, % of NDF, can vary up to 30 percentage units between TMRs. This variation is seldom taken into account in ration formulation and can have a major impact on dry matter intake potential and energy density of the TMR. Controlled research has demonstrated that high producing dairy cows will consume more feed and produce more milk when fed feeds containing NDF that is highly digestible.
What is
the utility of a laboratory TMR analysis? The utility of a
laboratory TMR analysis is to re-evaluate the nutrient composition of a TMR
that was actually fed to animals. The values from the TMR report can be
compared to the ration formulation and potential inconsistencies can be
identified. If the formulated nutrient content of a TMR does How much nutrient variation is in TMRs? Summaries of laboratory TMR analysis suggest that nutrient content as evaluated in the laboratory can vary substantially from what was formulated or assumed to be fed. While a complete review of all possible reasons for TMR nutrient content variation would be exhaustive a simple example is provided in Table 1. It is not uncommon for TMR nutrient densities to range 3-4, 5-6, 7-10, 4-5 and 5-6 percentage units from formulated values for CP, NDF, NDFD, Ash and TDN respectively. What are the limitations of evaluating TMRs in the laboratory? Laboratory TMR analysis only measures the chemical or nutrient densities in a TMR diet. Animal performance may be influenced by dry matter intake, physical factors (particle length, grind size) and qualitative factors (mold, fermentation) in a TMR, which are not routinely evaluated. In addition TMRs that are not homogeneous are extremely difficult to sample and laboratory evaluation is discouraged. Conditions making laboratory analysis of TMRs difficult include, partial TMRs which are top-dressed, TMRs containing frozen chunks of silage and TMRs containing excessive amounts of long dry forage. How is a TMR sample taken?
Table 1. Selected examples of laboratory analysis of TMRs fed to high producing lactating dairy cows formulated to contain (approximately): CP 18.0% NFC 40.0% NDF 29.0% TDN 75.0% Fat 5.0% NEL 0.78 Mcal/1b
Laboratory Values
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
|
|
|
|