|
Cooperative Extension/Volunteer
Monitoring Partnerships
As published in the Volunteer
Monitor Newsletter, Volume 15, Number 1, Winter 2003
by Elizabeth Herron and Kris Stepenuck.
Cooperative Extension is uniquely poised to carry out
volunteer water quality monitoring programs. Extension
has an established framework within communities and
is structured to provide the kind of community education
and training that is vital to volunteer monitoring efforts.
In fact the very mission of Extension-to bring science
to the people, conduct educational outreach, and encourage
"better practices"-could be lifted right out
of the stated goals of most volunteer monitoring programs.
This extraordinarily good fit led Extension in a number
of states (for example, New Hampshire, Florida, Rhode
Island, and Maine) to support volunteer monitoring even
before the 1992 Extension National Water Quality Initiative.
In 1995 the University of Rhode Island Cooperative
Extension (URI) received funding from Extension's national
headquarters to conduct the first comprehensive assessment
of Cooperative Extension volunteer monitoring programs
and their benefits to Extension and communities. Four
years later, URI and the University of Wisconsin-Extension
(UW) jointly were awarded a National Facilitation Grant
to build on that work and create a comprehensive support
system for Extension volunteer water quality monitoring
efforts.
A crucial first step for the Facilitation Project was
to update and expand the earlier assessment. We found
29 programs in26 states or territories in which Extension
plays a significant role, and from them we gathered
detailed information about why they started, how they
operate, and their successes and failures.
One thing we have learned is that no two programs are
alike! Different communities have different water quality
issues, and each Extension program is unique in the
specific resources it can offer. Extension programs
around the country have been very creative in finding
the best ways to support volunteer monitoring efforts.
Grassroots origins
While
Extension volunteer monitoring programs started for
a variety of reasons, we found one important similarity:
these programs are typically community-driven. Many
began when individuals or groups set out to respond
to local water quality problems and discovered that
little reliable, long-term data existed for the waterways
they were concerned about. In attempting to find good
technical advice about monitoring they turned to their
neighborhood Cooperative Extension, which responded
by working with local groups to create programs based
on the best current science while focusing on specific
community resources and needs.
For example, New Hampshire Lakes Lay Monitoring Program
Coordinator Jeff Schloss told us that the program originated
due to a "lack of timely and adequate sampling
to discern any water quality changes." Statewide
Marine Educator Esperanza Stancioff reported that Maine's
Shore Stewards began in response to a crisis in the
shellfish industry: bacterial water pollution from a
variety of unknown sources was forcing the closure of
many shell fishing areas.
Some Extension programs-including the Water Action
Volunteers in Wisconsin, the Hoosier Riverwatch in Indiana,
and the Volunteer Stream Monitoring Partnership in Minnesota's
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area-were established to help
standardize monitoring methods among existing volunteers.
According to Barb Liukkonen of the Volunteer Stream
Monitoring Partnership, "Many separate local programs
were in place, but there was virtually no communication
between or within basins or between volunteers and agency
staff or decision makers." The Volunteer Stream
Monitoring Partnership was formed to fill a need for
more consistency in methods and data management, and
more coordinated use of the data.
As the report summarizing the initial URI assessment
concluded, "The overall success of Cooperative
Extension volunteer programs is due in large part to
their grassroots, bottom up approach. These programs
often become embedded in their communities, as well,
as individuals and businesses take personal responsibility
for the health of their community's water bodies."
Different roles for Extension
Our
assessments revealed that Extension interactions with
volunteer monitoring take a variety of forms. Extension
often plays a lead role, with overall program coordination
provided by Extension staff. It's probably not a coincidence
that several of the longest-running Extension programs
(the New Hampshire Lakes Lay Monitoring Program, now
entering its25th year; and URI Watershed Watch and the
Maine Shore Stewards, both started in 1988) have enjoyed
this kind of substantial support from Extension.
Cooperative efforts with state environmental agency
programs are also quite common, with Extension typically
providing technical or staff support, and sometimes
funding. In Wisconsin, two programs (Adopt-A-Lake and
Water Action Volunteers) are cosponsored by the University
of Wisconsin-Extension and the Department of Natural
Resources, with assistance from other partners and local
organizations. The Hoosier Riverwatch in Indiana is
run through a similar partnership between Extension
and the state environmental agency. Alabama Water Watch
was formed as a cooperative effort between the Auburn
University Fisheries Department the Alabama Department
of Environmental Management; Alabama Cooperative Extension
recently joined forces with these groups to manage the
program.
Sometimes Extension's role is less apparent, with Extension
staff providing training assistance, technical consultation,
or educational materials. In Georgia, Extension agents
assist with well-established state-run Adopt-A-Lake
and Adopt-A-Stream programs. Several staff members with
the University of Missouri Extension have taken advanced
training with the Missouri Stream Team Program, qualifying
them to lead or teach Stream Teams.
Regardless of the role played by Extension, Extension-supported
programs are not immune from the challenges faced by
most volunteer monitoring programs-concerns about the
critically important elements of stable funding and
stable staffing. Because Extension over all is a federally
managed program, changes in national policies or funding
priorities can jeopardize locally important projects
like volunteer monitoring. Long-term Extension programs
are generally those that have diversified funding sources
and program elements, ensuring program flexibility while
maintaining the core priorities of the local community.
Beneficiaries
The advantages to stakeholders, to the monitoring program,
and to Extension from Extension involvement with volunteer
monitoring are many and varied. First, of course, the
community gets answers to their concerns and the ability
to respond to problems or protect their resources. In
addition, the volunteers gain access to current scientific
research and methods, as well as other university resources,
which can enable them to expand their monitoring activities
and improve the scope and credibility of the data.
The
large number of Extension programs that have elected
to sponsor or support volunteer monitoring efforts is
a clear testament to how well volunteer monitoring fulfills
Extension's three core goals:
Educating the public.
Volunteer monitoring programs disseminate water quality
information broadly in the community through citizen-to-citizen
interactions and provide an opportunity for hands-on
science education for youth.
Encouraging citizens to "adopt
better practices."
Through monitoring, citizens learn how our actions on
land affect the quality of surface and groundwater.
This leads directly to voluntary adoption of recommended
best management practices (BMPs) for water quality protection.
Bringing university science to the
community ... and community science to the university!
Volunteer monitoring programs can turn the Extension
link between university researchers and citizens into
a two-way street. The volunteer monitors benefit from
university expertise, and the data they generate can
in turn be useful to university scientists-especially
since volunteers frequently gather data in areas where
few others are monitoring, and often for longer periods
of time than most universities or agencies. Applied
researchers can especially benefit by targeting their
efforts toward locally identified concerns.
In addition, Extension support of volunteer monitoring
benefits Extension by:
Heightening the credibility and
visibility of Extension within the community.
Community-wide volunteer monitoring efforts attract
solid press coverage, increasing local awareness of
Extension activities and drawing diverse audiences to
other Extension water quality programs. The value of
Extension activities is underscored when government
agencies, community groups, or researchers use volunteer
data.
Forging new links between Extension
and other organizations.
Volunteer monitoring lends itself to collaboration among
citizens, educational institutions, private organizations,
and governmental agencies.
National Facilitation Project
Given the multitude of benefits to all parties, our
National Facilitation project is interested in expanding
Extension/volunteer monitoring collaborations. We plan
to do so by developing training materials and programs
to strengthen existing efforts and encourage the formation
of new ones. Because Extension programs around the country
have already created so many good resources, we are
gathering many of these together to create our "Guide
to Growing Extension Volunteer Monitoring Programs."
We also are working to support sharing between Extension
volunteer monitoring groups through a project website
and electronic listserv. Finally, to enhance data management
and sharing, a web-based data entry tool has been developed
and is currently undergoing testing through the Water
Action Volunteers.
So
the next time you are looking for some information about
water quality, watershed education, or good management
practices, consider Cooperative Extension at your local
land-grant university-they just may have the answer,
or maybe able to help you find it. After all, it is
the people's university.
For a complete listing of programs that are sponsored
or cosponsored by Extension across the nation, or to
learn more about this National Facilitation Project,
visit our website at www.usawaterquality.org/volunteer.
Q: What is one thing that all U.S. states and territories
have in common?
A: A land-grant university.
The name land grant comes from the Morrill Act of 1862,
which provided states with federal funds equivalent
to 30,000 acres of land for each Congressional senator
and representative. These funds, known as "land
scrip," provided an endowment to establish a people's
university. Today there are a total of 105 land-grant
colleges, with at least one located in every state and
territory (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands,
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the Trust Territories).
Over time, these land-grant universities assumed a
variety of duties to better serve the people in their
home states. To support these efforts, Congress passed
the Smith-Lever Act in 1914,which created the Cooperative
Extension Service, housed in the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Essentially, Extension was charged with
taking practical information generated by land grant
university scientists directly to the people and encouraging
citizens to adopt better practices in agriculture, home
economics, and rural development.
As our society has shifted from a rural agriculture
focus to more urban and suburban, so has the mission
of many Extension programs. In 1992, water quality impacts
from nonpoint sources became a priority with the establishment
of the Extension National Water Quality Initiative,
which opened the door to Extension support of volunteer
monitoring efforts.
Elizabeth Herron is Program Coordinator
at URI Watershed Watch, Coastal Institute, 1 Greenhouse
Road, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island
02881; emh@uri.edu; 401-874-2905.
Kris Stepenuck is Volunteer Stream
Monitoring Coordinator for Water Action Volunteers,
UW-Extension and WI Department of Natural Resources,
210 Hiram Smith Hall, 1545 Observatory Drive, Madison,
WI 53706-1289; kris.stepenuck@ces.uwex.edu; 608-265-3887.
Updated
Tuesday, 01-Jul-2008 11:57:52 CDT
|