June, 2002
Relative Forage Quality (RFQ)
Indexing Legumes
and Grasses for Forage Quality
Dan Undersander, University of Wisconsin
John E. Moore, University of Florida
Relative
Feed Value has been of great value in ranking forages for sale or inventorying
and assigning forage to animal groups according to their quality needs. With the introduction of the new approaches
to determining animal requirements in National Research Council Nutrient
Requirements for Dairy Cattle (2001), there is an opportunity to improve upon
this quality index through use of newer analyses and equations.
Relative
Feed Value was based on the concept of digestible dry matter intake relative to
a standard forage according to the following:
RFV = (DMI, % of BW) *
(DDM, % of DM) / 1.29
Where: DMI = dry
matter intake
DDM = digestible dry matter
Dry matter intake was estimated
from NDF and DDM from acid detergent fiber.
The constant, 1.29, was chosen so that RFV = 100 for full bloom
alfalfa. The constant was the expected
DDM intake, as % of BW, for full-bloom alfalfa based on animal data.
We propose to keep the same
concept and format for Relative Forage Quality (RFQ) except that TDN will be
used rather than DDM. Thus RFQ will be
as follow:
RFQ = (DMI, % of BW) * (TDN, % of DM) / 1.23
Where the divisor, 1.23, is used
to adjust the equation to have a mean and range similar to RFV (Moore and
Undersander, 2002). The following two
equations are recommended depending on whether or not the primary forage is
legume or grass:
1) For alfalfa, clovers, and legume/grass mixtures the
equations for TDN and DMI will be:
Total
digestible nutrients for alfalfa, clovers and legume/grass mixtures are
calculated from the new NRC recommendations using in vitro estimates of
digestible NDF as follows:
TDNlegume= (NFC*.98) + (CP*.93) + (FA*.97*2.25) +
(NDFn * (NDFD/100) – 7 (NRC, 2001)
where: CP = crude
protein (% of DM)
EE = ether extract (% of DM)
FA = fatty acids (% of
DM) = ether extract - 1
NDF = neutral detergent fiber (% of DM)
NDFCP = neutral detergent fiber crude protein
NDFn = nitrogen free NDF = NDF – NDFCP, else estimated as
NDFn = NDF*.93
NDFD = 48-hour in vitro
NDF digestibility (% of NDF)
NFC = non fibrous
carbohydrate (% of DM) = 100 – (NDFn + CP + EE + ash)
Dry matter intake calculations for alfalfa, clover and
legume/grass mixtures will be:
DMILegume
= 120/NDF + (NDFD – 45) * .374 / 1350 * 100 (Mertens, 1987 with NDFD adjustment proposed by Oba and Allen
(1999). 45 is an average value for
fiber digestibility of alfalfa and alfalfa/grass mixtures.
Where DMI is expressed as % of body weight (BW),
NDF as % of DM and NDFD as % of NDF.
RFQ = (DMIlegume,
% of BW) * (TDNlegume, % of DM) / 1.23
2) For warm and cool season grasses the
equations for TDN and DMI will be:
Total
digestible nutrients for warm and cool season grasses are calculated as:
TDNgrass = (NFC*.98) + (CP*.87) + (FA*.97*2.25) +
(NDFn*NDFDp/100) – 10 (Moore and Undersander,
2002)
Where terms are as defined previously and
NDFDp = 22.7 + .664*NDFD
Dry
matter intake calculations for warm and cool season grasses will be:
DMIGrass = -2.318 + 0.442*CP -0.0100*CP2
- 0.0638*TDN + 0.000922*TDN2 + 0.180*ADF - 0.00196*ADF2 -
0.00529*CP*ADF (Moore and Kunkle, 1999).
Where DMI is expressed
as % of BW, and CP, ADF, and TDN are expressed as % of DM
RFQ = (DMIgrass,
% of BW) * (TDNgrass, % of DM) / 1.23
References
Mertens, D. R. 1987. Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical
models of ruminal function. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1548-1558.
Moore, J.E., and
W.E. Kunkle. 1999. Evaluation of equations for estimating
voluntary intake of forages and forage-based diets. J. Animal Sci. (Suppl. 1):204.
Moore, J.E. and
Daniel J. Undersander. 2002. Relative Forage Quality : A proposal for
replacement for Relative Feed Value. 2002 Proceedings National Forage Testing
Association.
Moore, J. E. and D. J. Undersander, 2002. Relative Forage
Quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. p. 16-31 In: Proc. Florida Ruminant
Nutrition Symposium, January 10-11, University of Florida, Gainesville.
National Research Council.
2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed.
Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington D.C.
Oba, M. and M. S. Allen. 1999.
Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber
from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J.
Dairy Sci. 82:589-596.




Undersander©2001