S. M. Combs, J. B. Peters and Ling S. Zhang
Department of Soil Science
University of
Wisconsin-Madison
Animal feeds are routinely enriched with supplements to minimize potential for mineral deficiency, enhance feed efficiency or suppress disease. Most swine and poultry are housed in confinement without access to soil or forage that enhances the need for feed additives. Under practical feeding conditions it is usually necessary to provide supplemental sources of several macrominerals (Ca, P, Na, Cl, K, Mg and S) and trace minerals (As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, I, Mn, Mo, Se, Zn and others) to meet dietary requirements (NRC for Dairy Cattle, 1988, NRC for Swine, 1998 and NRC for Poultry, 1994). The effects of diet on manure composition are much less quantified than the digestibility of nutrients in feeds.
In addition to the presence of trace elements in
manure from supplementation, manure is increasingly being treated with chemical
additives to control odor, adjust pH, precipitate suspended solids or enhance
biological treatment (Day and Funk, 1998).
Amendments such as alum (Al2(SO4)3) and
Fe salts are used effectively in swine manure systems to precipitate
solids. Poultry producers can choose
from several amendments (alum, phosphoric acid, TSP, lime, gypsum, Fe salts and
others) to minimize NH4 volatilization by altering pH or inhibiting
microbial-aided uric acid decomposition.
Manure used to repeatedly supply major nutrients to
crops has the potential to elevate soil concentrations of these elements. The accumulation of P in excess of crop
needs is a common example. The
objective of this limited study was to determine the major nutrient (N, P, K,
Ca, Mg, Na and S) and trace element (Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, B, Se, Co, Cr and As)
content of dairy, swine and poultry manure and evaluate potential soil
management impacts. Manure samples
submitted by producers to public soil testing labs in the NCR-13, SERA-6 and
NEC-67 regions were split and analyzed by the UW Soil and Plant Analysis
Lab-Madison.
Average concentrations and associated statistics for 87 dairy, 10 swine and 24 poultry manure samples are given on an ‘as is’ or wet basis in Table 1. Knowing the ‘as is’ trace element concentration in manure may be more practical when considering the quantity potentially spread. Swine and poultry manure contained similar amounts of Zn, Cu and Mn (0.5–1.1 lb/wet ton) and was approximately 10-100 times higher than determined in dairy manure (0.01–0.06 lbs/wet ton). Liquid swine manure had about 6 times (0.6 lbs/1000 gal) as much Cu and about 10 times more Zn (1.03 lbs/1000 gal) than liquid dairy manure. Total Fe and Al content of swine (especially solid) ranged up to 40 times (19 lbs Fe/wet ton) more than either dairy or poultry.
Swine and poultry manure also contained about 10
times more Se (0.002 lbs/wet ton) than dairy.
Liquid dairy manure has only 0.008 lbs Se/1000 gal Monogastic animals
(poultry, swine) excrete Se primarily in urine but ingested Se is excreted
mainly in feces of ruminants (dairy cattle) (Mayland, 1989).
Swine and poultry manure had 0.01 to 0.02 lb Cr/l000
gal while liquid dairy had 10 times less.
Less than 3% of ingested Cr is actually absorbed by swine (NRC for
Swine, 1998). Similar differences were noted for Co.
Comparisons
Table 2 compares the results of this study on a dry
weight basis to other estimates of elemental concentrations in manure and
sewage sludge, (Capar et al., 1978; Peterson and Kelling, 1987; Dick and Chen,
1997). Changes in specialized feeding practices (i.e. Se, As), greater
therapeutic use of trace elements (i.e. Cu, Zn) and management (litter, no
litter) have contributed to changes in manure composition. This study showed about the same Zn and
slightly higher Cu concentrations than reported by Peterson and Kelling (1987)
for solid swine manure. Substantially
more B (489 mg/kg dry wt) in solid swine manure was estimated by Peterson and
Kelling (1987) than this study showed (30 mg/kg dry wt). Selenium concentrations in solid dairy
manure were about 2 times (0.58 mg/kg dry wt) higher than reported by Capar et
al. (1978) (0.35 low fiber diet, 0.30 high fiber diet). This difference may show the influence of
recently increased allowable supplemental Se levels (NRC for Dairy Cattle,
1988). Determined Cr concentrations in
solid dairy manure were about 10 times and Co 2 to 3 times less than reported
by Capar et al. (1978).
Most notable differences among reported results were
evident for poultry
(Table
2). Dick and Chen (1997) determined
high levels of Cu (477 mg/kg dry wt) similar to this study (437 mg/kg dry wt)
that were substantially greater than the 20-30 mg Cu/kg dry wt indicated by
others. Similar trends were evident for
Zn, As and Mn. Most poultry producers
are reported to feed an excess of CuSO4 causing a weight gain in
broilers related to possible reductions in pathogens contained in litter
(Moore, 1998).
Comparing the trace element composition of manure to
sewage sludge may put manure concentrations in better perspective (Table
2). Manure and sewage sludge (means
from 16 cities) have similar levels of most macro-elements (P, K, Ca, Mg, Na)
and some trace elements (Mn, Al, As).
However, concentrations of Fe, Co and Se are about 2 times, Zn and Cu
about 4 times and Cr 100 to 200 times greater in sewage sludge than
manure. Recent technology advances in
recovery of trace elements prior to discharge probably has decreased trace
element levels in sewage sludge that is currently land applied.
Table
1. 'As-is' total nutrient and trace
element content in selected dairy, swine and poultry manure.
Total Concentration * (wet weight basis)
N P2O5 K2O Ca Mg S Fe Al Na Zn B Mn Cu Se Co Cr As
![]()
Dairy solid lbs/ton wet ton
average 8.4 4.7 2.8 6.2 2.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.0002 0.0003 0.001 0.0001
sd 1.5 1.5 1.6 6.9 2.6 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.0001 0.0003 0.001 0.0001
max 13.5 9.8 10.4 51.8 17.6 1.4 3.1 2.4 1.1 0.17 0.03 0.19 0.08 0.0009 0.0020 0.005 0.0001
min 5.5 2.4 1.2 2.5 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0005
Swine solid
average 24.0 47.6 29.2 26.5 6.6 5.3 19.0 14.4 6.7 0.79 0.04 1.09 0.50 0.002 0.003 0.010 0.0024
sd 4.2 12.0 5.9 7.1 1.2 1.2 4.1 2.2 1.5 0.21 0.01 0.12 0.18 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.0009
max 27.6 60.2 36.6 33.9 7.5 6.8 23.9 16.3 8.6 1.02 0.05 1.30 0.72 0.003 0.005 0.013 0.0039
min 17.0 31.5 23.2 17.2 4.8 3.9 14.7 11.3 5.3 0.53 0.03 0.99 0.33 0.002 0.002 0.008 0.0016
Poultry all **
average 59.9 55.9 39.2 64.8 7.6 7.5 3.0 2.6 7.8 0.48 0.08 0.61 0.66 0.002 0.003 0.014 0.0330
sd 18.1 17.9 11.2 11.2 1.9 2.3 4.3 3.0 3.0 0.17 0.05 0.27 0.39 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.0510
max 94.8 90.4 55.4 191.9 10.6 10.7 21.8 12.7 12.3 0.83 0.30 1.13 1.34 0.004 0.005 0.033 0.1730
min 22.6 21.6 14.5 23.9 3.7 2.7 0.5 0.4 1.7 0.17 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.0002
![]()
Dairy liquid *** lbs/1000 gal
average 27.3 10.5 21.1 15.1 5.3 2.2 0.9 0.7 3.3 0.11 0.03 0.11 0.12 0.0010 0.001 0.002 0.0003
sd 10.3 4.7 10.5 8.8 3.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 1.8 0.06 0.02 0.05 0.24 0.0004 0.001 0.001 0.0003
max 50.2 19.6 39.8 36.8 14.7 3.9 3.4 3.0 7.7 0.23 0.06 0.20 1.19 0.0020 0.004 0.005 0.0010
min 11.1 3.4 6.8 5.2 1.9 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.0002 0.0003 0.001 0.0001
Swine liquid *
average 69.4 36.8 25.1 21.8 7.4 5.3 2.5 2.4 4.6 1.03 0.06 0.23 0.62 0.002 0.003 0.026 0.0024
sd 19.1 15.6 12.2 9.9 3.1 1.5 2.8 3.6 1.8 1.30 0.03 0.12 0.55 0.001 0.003 0.016 0.0025
max 95.9 63.3 41.8 35.6 10.7 6.7 7.4 8.7 7.3 3.34 0.09 0.41 1.45 0.004 0.008 0.042 0.0067
min 42.1 25.2 8.3 12.7 4.1 3.9 0.7 0.4 2.4 0.24 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.0004
*
Plant available concentrations depend on animal type, nutrient, application
method and number of years of previous
**
Includes unspecified 'chicken', and 'poultry' manure samples.
***
Liquid manure <15% DM.
Table 2.Comparison of determined solid manure and sewage sludge total
nutrient and trace element content on a
dry weight basis.
|
|
Dairy |
Swine |
Poultry |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Peterson |
|
Peterson |
|
|
|
Peterson |
Dick |
Sewage |
|
Nutrient |
UW |
Capar
et. al.* |
and |
UW |
and |
UW |
Capar
et. al |
and |
and |
Sludge |
||
|
|
|
low
fiber |
high
fiber |
Kelling** |
|
Kelling |
|
litter |
no
litter |
Kelling |
Chen*** |
**** |
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------%
(dry wt)------------------------------------------------------------ |
|||||||||||
|
N |
||||||||||||