|
1
|
- Wisconsin Forage Council Symposium
- January 30, 2003
|
|
2
|
- Capital Investment
- Annual Cost
- Volume of storage needed
- Labor cost and availability
- Silo longevity
|
|
3
|
- Herd Size
- Forage harvest capacity
- Speed of loading and unloading
- Compatibility with current system
- Flexibility for future needs
|
|
4
|
- Spoilage and other losses
- Potential to purchase feed or share with a neighbor
- Distance from feed storage to animals
- Convenience
- Personal Preference
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Holds large capacity
- Can be filled with conventional farm equipment
- Offers faster unloading rates
- Forage quality changes occur gradually if filled using the progressive
wedge
|
|
8
|
- Higher initial cost
- Requires greater care in filling and packing
- Will not work for smaller herds
|
|
9
|
- Packing is essential for good silage preservation
- Must be covered to avoid large storage losses
- Labor must be available
- Face removal of more than 6 in/day is recommended to avoid spoilage
|
|
10
|
- Smaller exposed surface area of silage
- Requires less area for construction
- Allows greater mechanization during filling and feedout
- Convenient to unload in winter
|
|
11
|
- Higher initial cost
- Unloads more slowly
- Silage moisture cannot be as high as compared to other silo types
|
|
12
|
- Face removal of more than 4 in/day is recommended to avoid spoilage
- Using an effective distributor can increase silo capacity by as much as
30%
|
|
13
|
- Lower capital investment
- Flexible storage system
- Feed is easily inventoried
- Can be used for small and large herds
- Fewer safety and health hazards
|
|
14
|
- Bags must be protected to prevent rips and tears
- Specialized equipment may be needed
|
|
15
|
- Locate on a hard all-weather surface
- Locate away from drainage areas and low spots
- For ease of feedout locate close to existing storage
- Face removal of more than 6 in/day is recommended to avoid spoilage
|
|
16
|
- Inexpensive
- Good for short term storage needs
|
|
17
|
- Large amount of exposed surface area
- Greatest loss of dry matter during storage
- More difficult to pack
|
|
18
|
- Packing is essential for good silage preservation
- Must be covered to avoid large storage losses
- Side walls should be 3 horizontal units for each vertical unit (about 18
deg)
|
|
19
|
- Low initial investment
- Flexible storage system
- Feed can be inventoried
- Can be used for small herds
|
|
20
|
- Damage can occur when storing and
moving bales
- Specialized equipment may be needed
|
|
21
|
- Every situation is different, do your own analysis
- Consider looking at: Investment
and Annual Costs of Forage Storages Spreadsheet.
- This and other documents can be found at the Team Forage Website:
- http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/teamforage/index.html
|