header
Cooperative Extension Skip Navigation UW Extension
Local Program Evaluation in Tobacco Control
Home Sitemap Contact Search

 

 

Navigation

RESOURCES

About Our Program
Evaluation Manual
Multi Year Action Planning
Existing Data
Evaluation Planning

Evaluation Methods

Analyzing Data
Using Results
Resources
Restaurant and Worksite Surveys
Clean Indoor Air
Coalition Development
Youth Prevention
Upcoming Training
Conferences & Presentations

Download a copy of the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print information provided as PDF files.
Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

 

Tips on implementing worksite smoking policy surveys

  1. Overview of Worksite Questionnaire: Content and Design
  2. Implementation Issues
  3. How to calculate sample size

4.      Other questions you have about conducting the worksite survey

1.      Overview of worksite questionnaire: Content and design.

The worksite survey covers the following 11 topics and has been tested by our regional evaluation specialists.

1.    Screening questions - depending on the quality of your list, you can find the answers to most of these prior to making the call

2.    Number of employees - important for analysis (size trends, size vs. policy – for example larger companies may have a policy vs. smaller ones which haven't formalized one).

3.    Type of industry, governance structure, who is responsible for setting smoking policies - can help to guide your programming.

4.    Are employees and customers allowed to smoke? If so, where? (inside, outside, vehicles) - nature of policies, level of smoking, and where you can have an impact.

5.    Does the labor union agreement address smoking policies? - can be a powerful leverage tool at larger sites.

6.    Do health insurance plans offer cessation benefits?

7.    Has worksite offered cessation assistance? - an area that can be addressed with programming.

8.    Is there a formal vs. informal smoking policy

9.    Reasons for having/not having smoking policies - major motivations, can help target campaign for changing attitudes - ex. cleanliness vs. health).

10.     Employee compliance with smoking policy and consequences if non-compliant - what's the policy worth if no one follows it?

11.     Assistance to develop/improve policies.  Information you collect using these questions can be used to educate, inform, and to help change policies.

  1. Implementation issues:

    (These questions were raised by participants in our needs assessment prior to the call)
    1. Refer to the article entitled Implementing a survey of worksite smoking policies: Fond du Lac’s approach as a good starting point. It is based on a conversation with Joyce Mann from the Fond du Lac coalition who has completed a worksite survey.

o        PDF fileImplementing a survey of worksite smoking policies: Fond du Lac’s approach (2 pages, 444 KB)

Contacting the "right person": The ideal person to contact for the worksite person is a Human Resources manager. Look for someone who has some say in the policies and some longevity in the company. If a human resources manager cannot be reached, ask for someone knowledgeable about safety or smoking policies. Also, a leadership office or the owner may know or may be able to direct you to the correct person if they do not have the time to answer questions. Although more time consuming, one can look at the company's website to identify appropriate staff. This can also be a time to engage people by offering to share results.

    1. Identifying the "best" times to call worksites: Unfortunately there is no "best" time to call a worksite. Basically, you have to look at the county and the makeup of the work force to determine what the best time would be. In general avoid the first thing Monday morning and lunch hours. Also, call at night if the business is open. If you call at the end or beginning of a business day, a VP or HR Manager may have their phone ringing directly through to them.
    2. Experience from those who have already implemented worksite surveys
      Lynn Downing - Price County: Used initial design with 4 businesses.
      • Small County: Largest employer has 100 employees, with most at around 50 employees
      • Most businesses were quite happy to speak with the coalition.
      • Answers were fairly positive, yet guarded - It made them think.
      • The employees tended to follow (even unwritten) policies.
      • No problems with the length - they took from 5-10 minutes, the questionnaire looks longer than it is.
      • Worksites wanted to make sure this information wasn't going to suddenly appear in the newsapaer, etc. (To take care of this comment - if you run into it, feel free to alter the introduction sheet to suit your needs. For example, you might add something about confidentiality, perhaps telling them that any data that is shared will be stripped of identifiers).
    3. Q: How do we coordinate doing the restaurant and worksite surveys simultaneously?
      A: It really depends on your specific campaign. This is something you might want to get individual help on, by contacting your regional specialist. In general, the restaurant survey would be a better tool to focus on if your campaign centered around exposure to ETS, but if you were dealing with employee health, the worksite survey would be more helpful. Mailing one of the surveys could be an alternative, but you run into validity and response rate issues.
    4. Q: Is terminating the survey for worksites with < 5 employees a hard and fast rule?
      A: No. You can adjust that number for what is appropriate for your coalition. Don't use this cut off it if it doesn't apply. We are seeking uniformity in our data (for a comparison between local level data), but our primary goal is for coalitions to collect relevant information for their campaigns. We will be able to sort things out if you submit data on worksites with fewer than 5 employees.
    5. Q: If we use questions from the survey, should we use your exact wording?
      A: Yes, that would be a good idea. The surveys have been carefully designed and tested to contain questions to help you in your campaigns. If you do change the wording of questions, please let us know before you submit data to us.
    6. Q: Are there any questions we should not remove?
      A: If you need to, you can remove questions that will not be useful for you at the local level. Our caution is that although they may not seem useful now, answers to these questions could be helpful in years down the road. We tried to make the survey as short as we could while still including questions that would assist you in running your campaigns over the long term. If you need to cut questions, please contact your regional specialist for help.
    7. Check validity of your responses: Whose response is credible? You may want to do a small random sample and interview employees to see whether their responses match those of management, particularly in worksites with larger numbers of employees. May want to interview line workers or ask for the mail room. This may show such differences as policy says no smoking, but many of the people in the mailroom do smoke without consequence.

      How do we do this?
      You will need to be creative to go about this. You could call the operator and ask to speak to someone in one of these areas, and see what happens. You may have trouble getting to the right people, but many may be willing to speak to you. It may help to explain how the information will be used, that it will be kept confidential, that these are standardized unbiased questions, and that you are just trying to see where they fall on reasons for and against smoking policy. I would use one or two questions to do this - not the whole questionnaire.
    8. Q: Should we only target larger worksites, with 50 or more employees?
      A: Kenosha's approach: Identify the top 10 largest employers to see which have policies and get them to implement smoke-free policies. This is a good approach to get information and fits their needs, however in general somewhere around 80% of Wisconsin businesses employ < 50 people and these worksites (in total) house a greater number of employees than a few large worksites (and in turn can also affect a large number of people with ETS exposure). The approach is dictated by your program goals, but in the long run it will be useful to collect as much data as possible.

      Rick Orton said Dane county did a survey of large worksites and got good information. They found out most of the sites had a smoking policy, however this didn't provide them with any information on the smaller employers. After reviewing their goals, they found out that they really needed that information. He suggested if you are already surveying larger employers, you should be inclusive and try to get as much information as possible. It will help you in the long run.
    • Anticipate nonresponse: What about those who don’t respond or refuse to participate? You need to choose a larger sample in anticipation on nonresponse. Estimate your telephone interview response rate at about 65%. To ensure credible results, you should shoot for a 60% response in any survey. That means if you want 122 surveys completed, you’ll need to sample how many? 122 = 65% of what? 122/.65 = 187 in the sample. Your sample size is 187 and your target response is 122, or 65%.
    • Select your sample: Using Excel, assign random numbers to each of the worksites on your list. Generate a separate list at random. If your list is smaller, cut up the names of the worksites, put them in a hat, and draw out your sample of 187 or if you have a randomly organized (non-alphabetized) list you can simply pick every 4th or 8th entry, or whatever interval will give you your sample size.

      Types of Sampling to Ensure That you get the Information you Desire:
      A twist: Suppose that of that list of 1,427 worksites, only 5 worksites employ more than 300 people. These 5 worksites are the biggest worksites in your county and together employ 4,700 people. If you conduct a random sample of 187, you’ll have 0.03% (one third of one percent) chance of selecting those worksites in your sample. What can you do?

      You can simply make sure you interview all the larger employers. This is called oversampling. If you want to make sure you have good representation from all worksites, you will want to sort the worksites into groups according to size and conduct a random sample of each group. This is called stratified sampling, and it ensures that you will survey worksites of all sizes. However, you will need to use the sample size chart for each group, not for the whole population, which means you will have a larger total number of interviews.

      Adaption: Sampling can also be adapted for use with mail surveys and focus groups. Depending on the topic, length, etc., mail surveys may only have a 10%-40% response rate and can introduce bias because of uncoded responses (those famous responses that dangle out in the margin), missing data, etc. This is the major reason the worksite survey was designed to be a telephone survey tool. You will get a better response rate and better data. Please contact your regional evaluation specialist for help in converting the worksite survey into a mail survey or if you have any sampling questions or want to apply sampling to another tool.

5. Other questions you have about conducting the worksite survey:

·         Q: How do we get our volunteers to reach the "right" person at the "best" time?
A: The best way to help is to recognize the difficulties they will be facing. Once they do 5 to 10 interviews, they will be more comfortable with this. Maybe set up an incentive structure and reward the callers for reaching a certain response goal. Also, be willing to complete questionnaires when worksites call back.

·         Q: Should we exclude large worksites with their parent companies out of state?
A: This is up to each individual program. It depends on your goals and how much you think you can make a difference. This may be an issue for border counties to discuss in more detail.

·         Q: Should we use Excel or Access to enter our data? (which is preferred)
A: The Excel and Access instructions and templates for data entry will be available on the web soon. In an August conference call we will discuss analyzing the data more closely. Choosing either Excel or Access will be up to each coalition, although we recommend that you use the Access template to enter your data if possible as it allows more control over what is entered. We hope the instructions and template we have created will be easy enough to follow even if you are not yet familiar with Access.