BOARD
OF DIRECTORS: Greg
Kerr-President, Fiver Falls; Mike
Costello-Vice President, Malone; Dan
Undersander-Exec Secretary-Treasurer, Madison; Ken Barnett Wausau; Doug Bastian Madison, Darell Christensen
Brownsville, Robert Eder New London; Joe
Holschbach Manitowoc; Bill Kautz
Milwaukee; Randy Knapp Chippewa Falls, Bryce Larson Cleveland, Ken Risler
Mondovi, Scott Schultz Loyal, Paul
Sedlacek Cadott; Ex-officio:
Dennis Cosgrove River Falls
and Keith Kelling Madison.
Volume 22, Number 2, June
1998
|
W |
elcome to the Summer 1998 issue of The Forager. What a spring it has been.
After a record warm winter, we are experiencing record warm weather this
spring as well. Alfalfa has come
through the winter in great shape, and as of the writing, first crop is being
taken up to two weeks early in some places. This year really showed the value
of scissors clipping and taking first crop according to quality rather than
calendar date. First
crop was at 170 RFV up to two weeks ahead of where we would have expected based on calendar date. Rain has been a challenge in southern Wisconsin; whereas, lack of it a problem in the north.
This issue focuses on Potato Leafhopper which is a
perennial problem in Wisconsin. There
is also an article on hay preservatives and desiccants, and one on bloat.
|
UPCOMING
EVENTS |
|
|
Wisconsin Forage
Council Forage Expo |
July 1, 1998 Arlington Research
Farm, Arlington, WI |
|
National Alfalfa
Improvement Conference |
August 2 - 6, 1998 Bozeman, MT |
|
American Society of
Agronomy Meetings |
October 18 - 22,
1998 Baltimore, MD |
|
Wisconsin Forage
Council Annual Meeting |
January 26-27, 1999
Paper Valley Hotel,
Appleton, WI |
|
American Forage
& Grassland Council Meeting |
Feb. 21-26, 1999 Omaha, NB |
In This Issue:
Facts About Potato
Leafhopper Damage In Alfalfa, pages 2 & 3
Hay Dessicants and
Preservatives, page 4
What is Bloat?, pages
5 & 6
1999 Wisconsin Forage
Council Forage Spokesperson Contest, page 6
We would like to thank Dairyland Seed Co., Inc. for sponsoring this
issue of The Forager.
Facts About Potato Leafhopper
Damage In Alfalfa
The potato leafhopper is reported to be the most
common and most destructive insect affecting alfalfa stands in North America. Leafhopper damage reduces alfalfa yield, hay
quality and in severe cases, stand life.
At one time or another, almost every alfalfa field in the Midwest and
eastern areas of the U.S. and Canada has suffered from leafhopper
infestation. It is common for alfalfa
growers to mistake leafhopper damage for moisture or heat stress, or Boron deficiency
due to the characteristic yellowing symptom caused by leafhopper damage.
To aid you in the process of leafhopper identification
and control, here are some facts about potato leafhoppers which may prove
helpful:
·
Adult
potato leafhoppers are yellowish or lime green, and about 0.13 inch long and
0.03 inch wide.
·
The
nymphs are similar in appearance, but lack wings. Both adult and nymph stages cause damage to alfalfa.
·
Leafhoppers
normally jump or crawl rapidly sideways when disturbed.
·
Leafhoppers
are sucking insects and feed on the sap from alfalfa plants and cause yellowing
and stunts plant growth.
·
Very
young alfalfa plants and plants in early stages of regrowth are the most
susceptible to leafhopper damage.
·
Infestation
is most likely to occur prior to the second and third cutting of alfalfa in
most areas, and in the first cut if it has been delayed.
·
Warm,
dry spring weather is much more conducive to leafhopper infestation than is
cool, wet spring weather.
·
Damaging
populations may be more likely when temperatures are between 70 and 90°F., and particularly when harvest is delayed.
·
Leafhoppers
typically migrate from the edge of the field inward.
How much
damage can leafhoppers cause?
Simply put - very significant and extremely costly
damage. Literally millions of dollars
are stolen from alfalfa growers each year by leafhoppers in terms of lost yield
and quality.
1. Established Stands
Studies have shown the average loss from an existing
stand of alfalfa is 500 pounds per acre per harvest where infestation
exists. Based on a hay price of $90.00
per ton, that would calculate to a loss of $22.50 per acre per cutting.
2. New Stands
The loss from new seedings is even more substantial
than that from established stands. Leafhoppers
can rob up to 1,300 pounds per acre per harvest, or cost a producer $50.00 per
acre per cutting.
The loss is not limited to just annual yield reduction. For example, when leafhoppers are controlled,
other factors which affect income and profitability are positively impacted:
Quality is improved -
alfalfa contains more protein when leafhoppers are controlled.
Recovery is improved -
plants are more vigorous and regrow faster after each cutting.
Stand life is improved -
plants which are not damaged are more healthy and better able to survive the
winter.
Yield the following season
is improved - plots have shown alfalfa stands produce 0.5 ton more hay the
following season if leafhoppers were controlled the previous year.
Where are
leafhoppers present?
Potato leafhoppers are believed to overwinter in a
large area across the southern U.S. Traditionally, it was thought that the
insects overwinter in areas of Mississippi and Louisiana and migrate annually
from there to areas of the mid- and upper-midwest. Recent research has shown that leafhoppers also overwinter on
pine trees in Georgia and Tennessee, and migrate from there to the northeast
each spring.
What are the
signs of leafhopper infestation?
Two primary symptoms of leafhopper infestation are
most common:
1. Yellowing or Hopper-Burn
Because the leafhopper removes juices from the
alfalfa plant and blocks vascular tissue as it feeds, it causes a wedge-shaped
yellow area to occur in the leaf tip.
As damage increases, the entire leaf turns yellow, giving a yellow or
burned tint to all the plants in the field.
2. Stunted Plant Growth
When infestations are at threshold or above, alfalfa
plants also are noticeably stunted in their growth, sometimes more than half
that of a normal plant. Use a sweep net
to detect leafhopper infestation before significant damage occurs:
For alfalfa fields of 10 acres or larger, it is recommended
to take 10 sweeps in at least five different locations and count the number of
adults and nymphs collected per location.
As a rule of thumb, if the number of leafhoppers collected from 10
sweeps per location equals or exceeds the height of the alfalfa stand, measured
in inches, control steps should be taken.
What are
leafhopper control options?
1. Biological Control
Under cool and wet conditions, a naturally-occurring
fungal pathogen may reduce the number of leafhoppers. However, the fungus does not appear every year or on every
plant. Other leafhopper predators have
been shown to only slightly reduce leafhopper infestation levels.
2. Cutting Schedule Control
When an alfalfa field is cut, adult leafhoppers will
leave. The wingless nymphs will remain
in the field, but soon die due to lack of foliage. Control by cutting, however, usually means harvest will be done
much earlier than it should be, which significantly reduces yield. Damage often has occurred prior to even an
early cutting, which means quality as well as yield loss.
3. Chemical Control
Treatment of the alfalfa crop with insecticides is
an effective way to control potato leafhoppers once a need to spray has been
determined. Several insecticides are
registered for leafhopper control and have been used effectively.
The downside to chemical control, of course, is the
cost and the required time delay between application and harvest. Chemical control costs can range between
$10.00 and $12.00 per acre per spraying.
Each chemical varies in the amount of time required between application
and harvest, but one week to ten days may be necessary. Insecticide labels should be read and followed
carefully. Producers are encouraged to
follow integrated pest management practices.
4. Plant A Resistant Variety
Planting a variety with true potato leafhopper
resistance allows growers to harvest when they choose, and to reduce the cost
and hassle of insecticide application.
Hay Dessicants and Preservatives
By Dan Undersander, Extension Forage Agronomist
Much interest has been expressed in compounds to
reduce field curing time of forages.
First, it is important to recognize that two totally
different types of products with different modes of action are sold: one is a
desiccant which is a compound applied to the hay at cutting to increase drying
rate, and the other is a preservative which is applied to hay as it is baled to
allow baling of wetter than normal hay without spoilage during storage. Both
products are usually applied through a spray system, which costs $600 to
$1,000, either on the mower (for dessicants), or on the harvesting equipment
(for preservatives).
Forage drying rate curves indicate that moisture is
lost rapidly at very high moisture contents (right after cutting) and less rapidly
as the hay becomes more dry. This means that hay, as we all know, initial
drying is rapid and loss of the final few percentages of moisture before harvesting
takes considerable time.
The desiccants that are effective contain potassium
or sodium carbonate. This compound disturbs the waxy cuticle of the alfalfa
stem to allow it to dry faster. Desiccants work only on legumes such as alfalfa,
trefoil and clovers. Effectiveness varies with climatic conditions. Desiccants
reduce drying time, most when drying conditions are good. Thus, they tend to
work better on second and third cuttings in Wisconsin. They are recommended for
hay making and are of less usefulness when forage is harvested as haylage.
Preservatives are applied to the hay as it is harvested
and prevents heating and spoilage of hay baled at high moisture contents. Preservatives are cost effective if used
only when needed to prevent rain damage to hay, and if applied uniformly to
windrow as it is entering the baler. The most effective preservatives for
alfalfa are organic acids, (primarily propionate and acetate) and their
derivatives such as sodium diacetate.
Propionate (propionic acid) has been most commonly
used, and any product containing a high percentage of this compound will be
effective. Use of ammonium propionate (also called buffered propionic acid),
rather than propionic acid, is recommended because the product is less caustic
- therefore safer to handle and less corrosive to machinery. When purchasing preservatives,
compare cost on a per pound of propionic acid basis. Other additives do little, if anything, to preserve hay. Some hay preservative products dilute the proponic
acid and require greater product use rates.
Rates of propionate required vary with moisture
content of the hay and are 10 lb/ton for hay at 20-25% moisture, 20 lb/ton for
25-30% moisture and 30 lb/ton for 30-35% moisture. Note that rates are for pounds of propionate, not product. Therefore, a product with 50% propionate
would need to be applied at twice the above rates.
Use of preservatives for hay above 35% moisture is
not recommended.
Anhydrous ammonia is an effective preservative for
grasses. It can be injected into bales or released into a stack of bales
covered and tightly sealed with plastic.
Ammonia should be applied at the rate of 20-40 lbs/ton with higher rates
used for hay near 35% moisture, and lower rates used when moisture is near 20%.
Currently,
evidence is not sufficient to indicate that microbial hay preservatives are
effective in preserving hay.
WHAT IS BLOAT?
By Dan Undersander & Dave Combs, UW-Madison
|
|
Bloat is a digestive disorder characterized by an
accumulation of gas in the first two compartments of a ruminant's stomach (the
rumen and reticulum). Production of gas
(primarily carbon dioxide and methane) is a normal result of the fermentation
processes. The gas is usually discharged
by belching (erutication), but if the animal is unable to remove the excess
gas, pressure builds up in the rumen-reticulum exerting pressure on the
diaphragm which prevents the animal from inhaling, and bloat occurs. The most
common type of bloat is frothy bloat where gas builds up in a foam or froth
above the rumen contents and normal belching is inhibited.
Observable bloat can occur after as little as 15
minutes of grazing. Often the animal bloats only mildly and stops eating. The discomfort is eventually relieved. In
more severe bloat, the animal's rumen is distended by ballooning of the rumen,
it urinates and defecates frequently, bellows and staggers. Death, due to
restricted breathing and heart failure follows unless action is taken.
When is it
likely to occur?
Bloat can occur on any forage that is low in fiber
and high in protein, but is most common on immature legume pastures. Bloat has
been observed on alfalfa, white clover and red clover pastures, but is rare on
trefoil, sainfoin and vetch pastures.
It usually occurs when cattle or sheep are first turned onto legume
pastures. It seldom occurs on grasses, (or pastures with at least 50% grass),
coarser pastures or hay. Bloat usually follows a heavy feeding or grazing period.
Animals that are hungry or greedy feeders are most susceptible. Frost, dew or
rain on the field often increase the likelihood of bloat. Bloat incidence is
likely to be increased during periods of rapid plant growth in the spring or following
a summer rain.
Thus, most bloat occurs:
·
when
cattle are first turned onto pastures in the spring
·
when
cattle are moved to new pastures
·
if
the previous pasture was grazed too short so that cattle are hungry
·
in
late summer, during periods of rapid plant growth
·
after
rain following a period of drought.
How do I
reduce the occurrence of bloat?
Begin grazing in the spring on pastures that are
grass or grass-legume (at least 50% grass) mixtures. This will allow the animal
time to adjust to the pasture.
Make sure that the animal is full when first put
onto pasture in the spring. This reduces the intake of the fresh pasture until
the rumen has had time to adjust to the new feedstuff.
Do not start animals grazing when the forage is wet
from dew or rain. Start animals on
legume pastures gradually. For example, leave cattle on pasture 1 hour the
first day and gradually increase grazing time to 4 hours by the third day and
day-long grazing by day 5. Be sure that
fiber is maintained in the animal ration during initial grazing periods. Feed some dry hay or corn silage to grazing
animals prior to turning them out to pasture.
Check animals for bloat carefully every 2 hours when
beginning grazing. When rotating cattle
or sheep among pastures, be sure that animals are moved fast enough so that
they are not excessively hungry when going onto fresh pastures.
Animals with supplemental feed will be less likely
to bloat. For example, a dairy cow,
where 40 to 50% of the intake is pasture will be less likely to bloat than beef
cattle, dairy heifers and sheep, where pasture comprises 100% of the diet.
Where bloat has been a problem, consider seeding
using birdsfoot trefoil as the legume because it is non-bloating.
Consider using Bloat Guard® (Poloxalene) during
periods where bloat is likely.
Poloxolene can be mixed with grain supplement or drinking water, drenched or
fed as a pasture block. Effectiveness
of this product depends an daily intake. Thus, mixing with a daily supplement
is more effective than feeding in blocks on pasture.
Some animals are chronic bloaters. If a particular animal frequently shows
signs of bloat, it may be best to remove that animal from the herd.
What do I do
if bloat occurs?
When bloat is observed, immediately remove all
animals from pasture and offer dry hay. This will reduce the bloat problem in
all animals that will eat. Causing bloated animals to walk is also helpful.
Bloat can cause death in as little as 1 hour, so it is important to be prepared
to render emergency treatment. Materials
and directions for use can be obtained from the local veterinarian.
1999 Wisconsin
Forage Council Forage Spokesperson Contest
|
|
We are planing to hold the Fifth Annual Forage
Spokesperson Contest in conjunction with our annual meeting in Appleton next January. Each year, as the time approaches, people
tell me “ I would like to do it, I just
wish I had known sooner.” Or “If I had known this summer, I could have
gotten some pictures.” So, here is
your notice!!! This year’s first
prize will be expenses for two (up to $1000.00) to attend the American Forage
and Grassland Council Annual Meeting which is in Omaha, Nebraska February
21-26, 1999. There, the winner will
participate in the AFGC National Spokesperson Contest. There are also cash
prizes and plaques for second through fourth place.
The contest consist of farmers giving a 15 minute
presentation on their farming operation. The presentations are typically based
on slides, so now is the time to plan for the contest. Take good photos of your
farm at its best. If you are interested
in participating or would like more information, contact Dennis Cosgrove at
715-425-3345 (dennis.r.cosgrove@uwrf.edu) or the Wisconsin Forage Council
office at 608-846-1825. Do it soon as
we only have room for four speakers.
WISCONSIN FORAGE
COUNCIL Field Day Tours (July 1, 1998)
What's New with Forages?
More mileage from
corn silage: management options. (Joe Lauer)
Kura clover: a new legume for pasture and hay. (Ken Albrecht and Rob Zemenchik)
Alfalfa blotch leafminer: a new pest of Wisconsin alfalfa. (John Wedberg)
Influence of plant
maturity on mineral composition of forages.
(John Peters)
What's New in Grain Crop Production?
Soybean management
with transgenetic varieties. (Ed
Oplinger, Mike Bertram and John Gaska)
Management strategies
for white mold control in soybean.
(Craig Grau, Ed Oplinger and Jim Kurle)
Postemergence weed
control effects on soybean yield.
(Chris Boerboom)
Winter wheat variety
performance and selection. (Ed Oplinger, Mark Martinka and Heidi Kaeppler)
Weed Management in Forage and Field Crops
Finding, identifying,
and controlling new weeds. (Jerry
Doll)
Weed management in
direct seeded alfalfa. (Gordon Harvey)
Factors that affect
weed-crop competition. (Dave
Stoltenberg)
Preventing or
delaying development of herbicide resistant weeds. (Gordon Harvey)
Soil Fertility and Management
Nitrogen management
for winter wheat. (Larry Bundy)
Composted manure as a
soil amendment. (Leslie Cooperband)
Field verification of
soil K buffering. (Keith Kelling)
Effect of subsoiling
on corn and soybeans. (Dick Wolkowski)
Grazing and Pasture Topics
Palatability of
orchardgrass. (Dan Undersander)
Selecting the right
orchardgrass variety. (Dan Undersander)
Stockpiled
forage. (Janet Riesterer)
Nitrogen cycling in
pastures. (Michael Russelle)